Kimberly Searl M.S., C-IAYT | MAY 18, 2026
The Mystery of the “Clean” Scan
One of the most pervasive frustrations in modern medicine is experiencing persistent pain while MRI or CT scans return “normal” results. When a clinician reports that the physical structures appear intact, yet your lower back feels as if it is being compressed, this often feels less like reassurance and more like a diagnostic impasse. Such experiences may prompt questions about whether the pain is psychological or whether the medical system lacks further solutions.
The traditional “body-as-a-machine” model has significant limitations. For decades, medical practice has focused on treating the body as a set of discrete parts, often overlooking the dynamic interactions between individuals and their environments. Recent research indicates that effective pain relief frequently depends not on repairing a specific vertebra or joint, but on retraining the nervous system.
The following five developments in pain science help explain why advanced imaging may not always identify the source of pain and offer guidance for initiating recovery.
Pain is a Protective Response, Not a Damage Meter
We often view pain as a “meter” that reflects the exact amount of tissue damage. However, modern science defines chronic pain as pain lasting beyond the normal healing time, typically three to six months. At this stage, the original injury has often healed, but the nervous system remains in a state of “high alert” known as Central Sensitization (CS).
In a sensitized system, the brain’s volume control is broken. This is often driven by impaired descending inhibition—a failure of the brain’s natural ability to filter out or dampen non-threatening signals. This results in two distinct phenomena:
Hyperalgesia: An exaggerated, intense response to a stimulus that would usually only be mildly painful.
Allodynia: A painful response to a stimulus that shouldn’t hurt at all, such as a light touch or the movement of clothing against the skin.
The strategic perspective shifts from viewing oneself as “broken” to recognizing an overactive protective system. This reframes the individual’s role from a patient with a malfunctioning part to an agent whose nervous system is excessively protective.
You Have Two Bodies: The “Lived” and the “Living”
In a clinical setting, there is often a disconnect between the body the doctor examines and the body you inhabit. Modern pain science distinguishes between the Living Body (the physiological object seen in scans) and the Lived Body (your first-person, subjective experience of being in the world).
Because the lived experience is non-reducible to mere physiological processes, a clinician cannot “see” your pain on an MRI. This gives the patient what researchers call epistemic privilege: because your experience is private and inaccessible to third-person testing, your narrative is the primary evidence of your reality. As the research emphasizes:
“The lived body (subjective experience) cannot be reduced to the living body (physiological processes).”
Meaning-Making is a 5-Dimensional Process.
Pain is not experienced in isolation. The interpretation the brain assigns to a sensation is shaped by a “5E” process, which influences pain intensity:
Embodied: Your physical body and its internal biological processes form the foundation of every sensation you feel.
Embedded: Your pain is inextricably tied to your immediate physical environment and your broader sociocultural surroundings.
Enacted: You perceive the world through affordances, meaning your pain is shaped by the possibilities for action you see (or don’t see) in your environment.
Emotive: Your emotional state directs your attention to what is salient, essentially “coloring” which signals your brain chooses to prioritize.
Extended: Your experience is shaped by external factors, ranging from medical equipment to your engagement with large-scale institutions such as healthcare and legal systems.
Yoga is “Brain Food,” Not Just Stretching
While often dismissed as mere flexibility training, yoga is a sophisticated “biopsychosocial” intervention that targets the brain’s software. Chronic pain is frequently linked to impaired cortical plasticity, in which the brain’s body maps become blurred or “smudged.”
Yoga intervenes in sensitization pathways to reduce symptom propagation. By incorporating asana (postures), pranayama (breath regulation), and dhyana (meditation), yoga regulates the sympathetic nervous system and increases GABA, the brain’s primary inhibitory neurotransmitter. This process not only relaxes muscles but also recalibrates the brain’s capacity to modulate pain, thereby reducing pain catastrophizing and the fear of movement.
Education is the Intervention (PNE)
One of the most profound discoveries in modern neuroscience is that understanding why you hurt can actually change how you hurt. This is known as Pain Neuroscience Education (PNE).
Traditional patient education frequently emphasizes spinal anatomy, often using images of “slipped discs” or “bone-on-bone” degeneration. Research indicates that this approach can be nocebic, increasing fear and exacerbating the pain experience. In contrast, Pain Neuroscience Education (PNE) aims to reconceptualize pain as a protective output of the brain. Evidence suggests that PNE is most effective when delivered through individualized oral sessions, supported by materials such as brochures and comprehension exercises. When the brain no longer perceives the body as severely damaged, it can reduce the intensity of pain signals.
The Future of Feeling Better
We are standing at the threshold of a massive shift in medicine—moving away from a biomedical model that treats the body like a car in need of a mechanic, toward a biopsychosocial model that treats the human as a whole, sentient being.
Achieving relief does not always depend on surgical intervention or unremarkable imaging results; rather, it often requires a revised understanding of the interactions among the brain, body, and environment.
If pain is a story your brain tells to protect you, what new story can you begin to write today?
Resources:
Lepri, B., Romani, D., Storari, L., & Barbari, V. (2023). Effectiveness of pain neuroscience education in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain and central sensitization: A systematic review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(5), 4098.
Stilwell, P., & Harman, K. (2021). Phenomenological research needs renewal: Time to integrate enactivism as a flexible resource. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 20, 1-15.
Searl, K. (n.d.). Musculoskeletal & neurological conditions [PowerPoint slides].
Searl, K. (n.d.). Teaching spine: Pain as an embodied process—A yoga therapy framework for assessment & care [PowerPoint slides].
Waterfall Yoga LLC. (2026). The science of yoga therapy for chronic pain.
PPM Editorial. (2020, November 6). Yoga helps reverse the effects of pain on the brain. MedCentral.
Pearson, N., Prosko, S., Sullivan, M., & Taylor, M. J. (2020). Yoga therapy and pain: How yoga therapy serves in comprehensive integrative pain management, and how it can do more [White paper]. International Association of Yoga Therapists.
Sullivan, M. B., Erb, M., Schmalzl, L., Moonaz, S., Taylor, J. N., & Porges, S. W. (2018). Yoga therapy and polyvagal theory: The convergence of traditional wisdom and contemporary neuroscience for self-regulation and resilience. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 12, 67.
Nikolis, A., Nikolis, L., & Meron, A. (2024). Yoga as an adjunctive treatment for chronic low back pain: A narrative review. Pain Physician, 27(6), E661-E675.
International Association of Yoga Therapists. (2020). Yoga therapy and pain: How yoga therapy serves in comprehensive integrative pain management, and how it can do more [IAYT White paper].
National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health. (2023, February). Pain: Considering complementary approaches [eBook]. U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, National Institutes of Health.
Kimberly Searl M.S., C-IAYT | MAY 18, 2026
Share this blog post